Skip to main content

Ground-up Projects

I stumbled upon an online story a couple of months ago through one of the digital fiction feeds I actually pay attention to. It was a really fun, neat little story, and I subscribed to the author's feed because I wanted to read more of his work.

That first story was completely free online and on various readers (Kindle included). It was a story that used elements of the new digital world, but was essentially a straightforward print story online. Nothing incredibly innovative, just good writing. It was fairly popular, though, to date generating 72 comments (not bad for a non-commercial, non-controversial post).

I didn't get any further posts from that feed for quite some time. The second story that came out was under a different model - the Kindle version was for sale, and once 100 Kindle copies had sold, he would release the free online version. It took only a few days for the free version to go up.

After that, he began a new endeavor: a not-yet-written novel (novella, really) based on the first short story. He launched a project at Kickstarter, using a pledge system. If you're interested in the project, you pledge $3/11/19/29/39 based on different package levels for the book. A $3 pledge would earn you a PDF of the book, an $11 pledge the PDF and hard copy, etc. He set a goal of $3500 by November - if the goal were raised, he'd start and finish the project. If not, no worries, for any party - he wouldn't do the project, and the backers would not have to part with any money.

It's the first time I've really seen a fiction writer guarantee themselves the cost of their work is covered, and indeed offering a profit. It's also the first time I've seen a project like this offer different levels of satisfaction depending on pledge level.

For one thing, it significantly increases the readers' eventual level of emotional investment in the final story. You were in on it from the beginning! Your pledge helped bring it into existence in the first place. As an investor, you are far more likely to talk about it to your friends, to post about it on FaceBook (and thus do the lion's share of the word of mouth marketing that is so very important in start-up ventures). In fact, the $39 pledge level was the most frequently chosen - it includes several copies of the book, so you can give some to your friends. Brilliant. The fact that so many people went for this option over the much easier $3 or $11 levels shows that people want to be intimately involved in things like this.

As an author, it gives you immediate feedback on your work, your relationship with your audience, your impact upon them. We spend so much time not knowing if anyone is interested in our work, if anything is really worth doing. This project shows the author, before he's even started, that yes, this work is actually worthwhile.

It also skipps over the emotionally traumatizing agent/editor submission (and primarily, rejection) process. You go straight to your audience. Let's face it, audiences are far more forgiving than agents and editors are (just look at Dan Brown's novels and the success of G.I. Joe). Rather than filtering through a gatekeeper system (consisting of one, maybe two people who may or may not be in a good mood the day they read your work, or who may not share your tastes in genre, etc.), you go straight from author to reader. What could be better than that?

Furthermore, this takes the concept of self-publishing and adds some legitimacy to it. You didn't write a book, get rejected from every agent and publisher in the world, and then decide to give them the middle finger and publish it anyway. You presented the concept to your readers, and they opened their wallets to support you. They gave money - that's something that any agent or publishing company will pay attention to.

You'll find that if you can get a legit publisher, almost any agent will take you on (with easy dollar signs in their eyes). I'd bet that if you show publishers your record of successful sales to readers, that would work just as well. After all, under this model, he'll sell at least 1167 copies of his book, with no remainders (I assume a print-on-demand self-publishing model). When publishers put out a novel, they have no such 100% sales expectation.

Of course, there's no reason he'd ever have to go to a publisher, unless he wants to, or unless his popularity grows to such a massive scale he actually needs the big boys to handle it. As an author, there's nothing wrong with embracing this model as a long-term solution.

It's definitely something I want to explore further, and maybe even try to implement myself. I'd like to see if other authors are trying this, and what level of success they are having. I'd like to see what other types of projects are working through this model, and what the reader reactions are. It's a pretty wealthy area for paper topics and further discussion.

The only question is: will the final work be worth the pledge? I suppose we'll find out.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Did Somebody Offer a Challenge?

Bruce Sterling over at Wired.com posted eighteen of them for Contemporary Literature. It's a skeletal overview: a list of statements without background or exploration of any. I'd like to offer a few brief thoughts on the list, just for my own brainstorming sake. Who knows; there may be eighteen papers in here somewhere. 1. Literature is language-based and national; contemporary society is globalizing and polyglot. "Contemporary society" is a pretty big blanket, there, Bruce. I think you might mean "contemporary digitally literate culture" - after all, it's only in the Westernized world that we are beginning to share our language and culture through global media such as Facebook and mobile phones. This also assumes a very strict definition of literature: that which is published in print form, presumably a book. 2. Vernacular means of everyday communication — cellphones, social networks, streaming video — are moving into areas where printed tex...

My Take on Specifications Grading (or, How I Learned to Not Spend My Weekends Marking)

I’ve been proselytizing this method for a while now, and have used it in a range of creative writing and publishing modules. It’s been wildly successful for me (though of course I’ll continue tweaking it), and enough people have asked about it that I thought I’d put it together into an overview/summary resource. It should probably be an actual paper one of these days, but that would require time and research and motivation. Natch. My teaching model is based on Linda Nilson’s Specifications Grading  (she’s also got a great intro article on Inside Higher Ed ), just so the original genius can get plenty of credit. My motivations are these: I came a hair’s breadth from burning out entirely. I went from teaching creative writing classes with 7-10 students on them to massive creative writing modules with 80+ students on them. Marking loads were insane, despite the fact that I have a pretty streamlined process with rubrics and QuickMarks and commonly used comments that I can cut and ...

In which the Apathy Monster is curtailed

Me, lately I spent my PhD years going to many, many  conferences. When you're in a small department in an isolated part of the world, they're kind of a necessity. You go to meet anyone - anyone  - who is doing similar stuff, and who won't stare at you blankly when you describe your research. You go to try out your ideas, to make sure the academic community you'll be pitching them to don't think you're an absolute waste of space ( imposter syndrome is for real). Also, you go just to go somewhere (though I think I went to Leicester far too often). In the last few years, as I've gained contacts and confidence, I've gone to fewer and fewer conferences. I know the ones that best suit me now, and where I'll get to meet and/or catch up with my peeps. I also know the ones, of course, where I've never made any headway at all. I was pleasantly surprised this week to be wrong about that last one. MIX Digital - Bath Spa University Let me back thi...