Skip to main content

Posts

Showing posts with the label Academic Blogging

Satisfaction, y'all: what is it good for?

The Baader-Meinhof phenomenon was strong with me this week. It's end of term, end of the academic year, and we're all caught up in the requesting (begging) of student feedback, along with its requisite trauma. An old friend of mine who is a nurse posted this article about patient satisfaction vs. patient health , and the sentiments strongly parallel what I hear from staff and out of my own mouth. My mom just wants it all to stop; with every purchase, site visit, and receipt, she gets a request for customer feedback, and let's face it: unless you're on one extreme of customer experience or another, you just can't dredge the energy to care. Student feedback is fertile ground for frustration. We're told we're not collecting enough feedback (the bean-counter kind): we can't get enough responses to officially administered feedback for statistically significant and/or representative feedback. On the other hand, we collect so much feedback that at times it f...

Yes, I'm Still Working

You may have noticed few writing or PhD-related posts in the past couple of weeks. That would be because I am currently crushed beneath a dump-truck's worth of student papers to mark. Back to our regularly scheduled program as soon as I can dig myself a hole to survival.

CEDAR, Session 3: On Academic Blogging, Collaboration, and Creativity

Yesterday was CEDAR 's third session in Leicester, at De Montfort University's Institute of Creative Technologies . We covered blogging for academics, using Web 2.0 resources for document collaboration, creation, and presentations, and a bit on creative processes. For me, the session wasn't quite as useful as the last one, primarily because I (obviously) already blog, and already use the Web 2.0 resources covered (plus a truckload of others that would take days to discuss in such a seminar format). I think I'm to blame a bit - the last session I didn't have any real expectations, as the topics initially didn't seem at all applicable to my work. When I found applications, I was stoked. This time, the topics seemed catered to my research...but because these aren't necessarily advanced sessions, it was all at a level I've already mastered. So I had higher expectations than I should have had. I did suggest that in the future we might consider breaking ...