Skip to main content

The End, the Means, They're All Big Deals

I'm sure I've written this post before, and I probably will write it again, but I'm such a dope I seem to always be forgetting about this issue. It helps me to reiterate it, and maybe some writer on some random Google search will come across it and take something home from it. Who knows.

I teach beginner writers a lot, and they always ask me about advice they've gotten from writing books or other writers with regard to process. They think they absolutely should be writing X number of words, every day, at the same time. That it should all come out perfect in the first draft, and that writers who are published are just amazingly talented geniuses.

I don't know how much they absorb of what I say, but I try my damnedest to shatter these illusions. I talk about planners and "pantsers" (those who fly by the seat of their pants, never knowing what will come next). I talk about notebooks, about habits, about writing a few words every day. That some of us can get up at 5 a.m. every single morning and write for two hours before we go to our day jobs, and others write in bipolar fits and bursts.

They're all happy to find they can develop their own process, but I usually don't have them around long enough to discover what those processes wind up being. So when I think about the writing process, I tend to only think about my writing process.

I get into such a rut about how I write, I can't imagine anyone could do it differently. If they do, it certainly can't be as good. Yes, I am alone and isolated a bit much for my own good.

But a conversation I had the other day reminded me that the writing world does not revolve around me. Harsh, I know.

I mentioned my current goal of writing 3000 words a day for the next 6 weeks, and my writer colleague nearly fell out of his chair. He felt that was a gargantuan task, but I, after several years of NaNoWriMo experience, think it's a great way to get first drafts finished. I like the revision part much better, you see.

He said he once determined to write a novel by a certain date, writing 500 some-odd words every day. It nearly killed him, literally - he required heart medication.

As we delved deeper, we discovered other differences. He must have every word perfect before he can move forward to the next. I'm likely to just throw in a pair of brackets, i.e., [some sort of gray thing], so I can fix it later.

I see the story as a film in my head - I have to transcribe it as quickly as possible, or it will move on without me and I'll miss significant chunks. He doesn't see the story visually at all - to him, the text and the characters' emotions are everything.

I start with an idea, usually a broad theme, but must focus on a character with a conflict and a broad outline (or just a direction) to start writing. He takes the theme and runs with it.

I know others have varying differences: one author I know can write the 3000 words a day, but she doesn't work from an outline beyond some ideas she works out the night before as she's falling asleep. I'd be Ed Norton in Fight Club if I tried that.

I may be working on a joint grant sometime in the future on multimodal creativity, essentially developing a software for writers, new media writers, and multimodal creators to be able to work and develop a project all within one platform. In order to do that, I'm going to have to become very familiar with the wide range of processes people engage to get their work done.

I'm looking forward to that, to the motivation it provides when I find people can work faster and better than I do, to the simple understanding of the ways creative pieces emerge. After all, the end product is generally in a similar package and format - it's how we all get there that's different each time.

It's a big part of the practice-based research discussions that are ongoing among creative industries academics - that not only is the end product important, so is the method for getting there. The experience of creating, and our shared understanding of that, is just as worthy an academic topic as is structuralist discourse.

I suppose I'll have to write a dissertation chapter on it. Just not today.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Did Somebody Offer a Challenge?

Bruce Sterling over at Wired.com posted eighteen of them for Contemporary Literature. It's a skeletal overview: a list of statements without background or exploration of any. I'd like to offer a few brief thoughts on the list, just for my own brainstorming sake. Who knows; there may be eighteen papers in here somewhere. 1. Literature is language-based and national; contemporary society is globalizing and polyglot. "Contemporary society" is a pretty big blanket, there, Bruce. I think you might mean "contemporary digitally literate culture" - after all, it's only in the Westernized world that we are beginning to share our language and culture through global media such as Facebook and mobile phones. This also assumes a very strict definition of literature: that which is published in print form, presumably a book. 2. Vernacular means of everyday communication — cellphones, social networks, streaming video — are moving into areas where printed tex...

My Take on Specifications Grading (or, How I Learned to Not Spend My Weekends Marking)

I’ve been proselytizing this method for a while now, and have used it in a range of creative writing and publishing modules. It’s been wildly successful for me (though of course I’ll continue tweaking it), and enough people have asked about it that I thought I’d put it together into an overview/summary resource. It should probably be an actual paper one of these days, but that would require time and research and motivation. Natch. My teaching model is based on Linda Nilson’s Specifications Grading  (she’s also got a great intro article on Inside Higher Ed ), just so the original genius can get plenty of credit. My motivations are these: I came a hair’s breadth from burning out entirely. I went from teaching creative writing classes with 7-10 students on them to massive creative writing modules with 80+ students on them. Marking loads were insane, despite the fact that I have a pretty streamlined process with rubrics and QuickMarks and commonly used comments that I can cut and ...

In which the Apathy Monster is curtailed

Me, lately I spent my PhD years going to many, many  conferences. When you're in a small department in an isolated part of the world, they're kind of a necessity. You go to meet anyone - anyone  - who is doing similar stuff, and who won't stare at you blankly when you describe your research. You go to try out your ideas, to make sure the academic community you'll be pitching them to don't think you're an absolute waste of space ( imposter syndrome is for real). Also, you go just to go somewhere (though I think I went to Leicester far too often). In the last few years, as I've gained contacts and confidence, I've gone to fewer and fewer conferences. I know the ones that best suit me now, and where I'll get to meet and/or catch up with my peeps. I also know the ones, of course, where I've never made any headway at all. I was pleasantly surprised this week to be wrong about that last one. MIX Digital - Bath Spa University Let me back thi...