Skip to main content

Checking up on Myself

I should have done this a couple of months ago... I guess I could post-date it, but I'll be all honest and stuff.

At the beginning of this semester, I had a supervisor meeting, which inspired me to draw up a plan for how I'm going about this PhD. It's a good plan.

Plans are great and all, but only as far as they actually work. So as I've used semesters (3 per year, fall, spring, summer) to milestone my plan, I'm going to post one of these at the end of each semester to see how I'm doing, and to see if I need to adjust my plan at all. Here goes.

Semester 1 (Fall 2008) Plan & Outcomes:
Plan: Explore idea, background of North Wales for inspiration for print novel
  • Outcome: Did a lot of exploration, read some Welsh mythology, wandered around Anglesey taking pictures. I have a lot of ideas now for the novel, and not just based in Welsh mythology. I think this is going to take on a bit more of world mythology, sort of a globalization theme that reflects what New Media is doing to connect people.
Plan: Immerse self in academic environment, methods of practice-led research
  • Outcome: Joined a New Media Research Circle, have attended/participated in all of the practice-based/led research sessions. Have attended available conferences, and presented at the Research Student Forum Conference. I've generated a lot of ideas about what I want my practice-based research to look like, how it should unfold, how the creative and critical should feed into one another. I'm also on committees for two academic conferences, presenting at two this summer, and am participating in the Digital and Collaborative Multimedia in the Humanities Training Scheme.
Plan: Paper on novel adaptation to online/digital elements
  • Outcome: "The Shifting Author-Reader Dynamic: Online Novel Communities as a Bridge from Print to Digital Literature" is finished (for now). I presented it at Shark Tank, and got some good feedback. I submitted it to Convergence, and it is currently under review for their Feb 2010 issue themed "Authors and the Web."
Plan: Maintain process blog
  • Outcome: Keeping up! Here it is. I'm averaging (I hope) about 3 posts a week, on various topics.

Adjustments to Semester 1 Plan:

None required.


Semester 2 (Spring 2009) Plan:
 Plan: Complete a written short story with aim to adapt it to a digital story
Plan: Explore and trial-test various software platforms for adaptation
Plan: Storyboard written short story for digital adaptation
Plan: Maintain process blog
Plan: Continue to research legend & mythology, brainstorm novel
Plan: Continue multi-media networking


There it is. Semester 2 has already been slightly adjusted to account for the fact that I hardly have any time whatsoever to work on the PhD this semester, but we'll go from here. Sometime in May I'll check in again, and hope I don't have a giant FAIL marked across my face.
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Did Somebody Offer a Challenge?

Bruce Sterling over at Wired.com posted eighteen of them for Contemporary Literature. It's a skeletal overview: a list of statements without background or exploration of any. I'd like to offer a few brief thoughts on the list, just for my own brainstorming sake. Who knows; there may be eighteen papers in here somewhere. 1. Literature is language-based and national; contemporary society is globalizing and polyglot. "Contemporary society" is a pretty big blanket, there, Bruce. I think you might mean "contemporary digitally literate culture" - after all, it's only in the Westernized world that we are beginning to share our language and culture through global media such as Facebook and mobile phones. This also assumes a very strict definition of literature: that which is published in print form, presumably a book. 2. Vernacular means of everyday communication — cellphones, social networks, streaming video — are moving into areas where printed tex...
Post a Comment
Read more

My Take on Specifications Grading (or, How I Learned to Not Spend My Weekends Marking)

I’ve been proselytizing this method for a while now, and have used it in a range of creative writing and publishing modules. It’s been wildly successful for me (though of course I’ll continue tweaking it), and enough people have asked about it that I thought I’d put it together into an overview/summary resource. It should probably be an actual paper one of these days, but that would require time and research and motivation. Natch. My teaching model is based on Linda Nilson’s Specifications Grading  (she’s also got a great intro article on Inside Higher Ed ), just so the original genius can get plenty of credit. My motivations are these: I came a hair’s breadth from burning out entirely. I went from teaching creative writing classes with 7-10 students on them to massive creative writing modules with 80+ students on them. Marking loads were insane, despite the fact that I have a pretty streamlined process with rubrics and QuickMarks and commonly used comments that I can cut and ...
Post a Comment
Read more

In which the Apathy Monster is curtailed

Me, lately I spent my PhD years going to many, many  conferences. When you're in a small department in an isolated part of the world, they're kind of a necessity. You go to meet anyone - anyone  - who is doing similar stuff, and who won't stare at you blankly when you describe your research. You go to try out your ideas, to make sure the academic community you'll be pitching them to don't think you're an absolute waste of space ( imposter syndrome is for real). Also, you go just to go somewhere (though I think I went to Leicester far too often). In the last few years, as I've gained contacts and confidence, I've gone to fewer and fewer conferences. I know the ones that best suit me now, and where I'll get to meet and/or catch up with my peeps. I also know the ones, of course, where I've never made any headway at all. I was pleasantly surprised this week to be wrong about that last one. MIX Digital - Bath Spa University Let me back thi...
Post a Comment
Read more