Skip to main content

Deconstructing the SEP Field

Douglas Adams, creator of the world (literally)-famous Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy, invented a concept that I am now fully convinced actually exists: the Somebody Else's Problem (SEP) Field. This field makes items, people, events, even entire spaceships, disappear, simply because anyone seeing them will write them off as somebody else's problem. And when something is someone else's problem, not your job, or out of your control, you ignore it to the point it might as well not even exist. It can still, however, blow your head off if that's its purpose. Very quickly, "somebody else's problem" can become "everyone's huge disaster."

I've come across two quotes this week that made me want to shove both utterers hard enough to knock them out of that SEP field. The first came from P's stepmother as she lamented the strange and peculiar weather happening both worldwide and locally to her in Cairns, Australia lately. Finally, she gave up trying to figure out the cyclones and icebergs in summer, and just said, "Oh, well, it's Nature. Nothing we can do about it."

Actually, that's not right at all. A lot of the strange weather patterns we've experienced in the last few years are a result of our (i.e., humans') negligent and detrimental actions. We drive our SUVs, never take the bus, leave the engine idling outside stores while we "run in." We buy our food processed and packaged in cardboard and plastic, then toss it all in a landfill, individually creating tons of garbage every year. We plant grass and trees in the desert, sucking down aquifers for the sake of aesthetics. We hold on to old ways of living in new environments that can't sustain them, destroying fragile ecosystems (and, subsequently, our livelihoods) in the process.

Because we've brought this destruction on ourselves, we also have the power to stop and reverse it. One by one, as individuals and communities, we can demand and create change for a healthier world.

What stops us from making changes, even small ones, is our SEP-attitude: I can't do anything about it. It's too big, I'm only one person. That's not my job. This is the way it's always been, and we've survived, so why change it?

We defeat ourselves. Yes things have "always been this way": humans back before the development of agriculture have damaged their environment by overhunting, then overfarming, deforestation, pollution, and so on. Since the industrial revolution, our effects have grown exponentially. And no, we will not continue to survive if the glaciers melt, if the planet's diversity dies, if we outgrow our food supply. But the first step is to accept our responsibility, and dedicate ourselves to changing as individuals.

I agree, just one "little old me" can't force the entire country of Japan to cease their whaling ceremonies. On my own, I can't resolve the energy crisis, and provide clean and abundant power for the world. But like a small pebble tossed into a lake, I can take actions to better my world, and hope that the ripple eventually makes its way to the shores of other peoples' consciousness. I can remodel my home with bamboo flooring, a clean, renewable resource even more beautiful and economical than environmentally damaging hardwood. I can decorate my wedding with flowers made from soda cans, candleholders made from food tins, and then recycle the lot when I'm done, instead of spending thousands of dollars for cut flowers, flowers that are farmed in a distant place and shipped via gas-guzzling, polluting refrigerated diesel trucks. I can choose to purchase my food from local organic farmers instead of corporations, again avoiding the indirect pollution of the shipping industry. I can make purchases at my stores of environmentally-friendly products instead of their cheaper, dirtier competitors, sending a message to the store manager with the money that I spend. I can give gifts of knowledge to my friends and family: Jared Diamond's Collapse, Al Gore's An Inconvenient Truth. I tell people why I do what I do, share what I learn, and hope that I've planted a seed whereby other folks in my community will think twice before leaving a light burning all night, or will decide to bike or bus to work a couple of days a week. In return, they send ripples out through their networks, until the wings that I flapped here created a hurricane on the other side of the globe. This is how just one person, seemingly insignificant, can create change.

The second quote, the other SEP field, is less concrete, but just as infuriating to me: "As a single mom, I had no idea what to look for myself." This was in an article in my workplace's "Porcelain Press" (yep, a newsletter posted in bathroom stalls) stressing the importance of properly using your gas heaters. The author had nearly asphyxiated herself with her gas camping heater, and when the CO monitor alarm went off, of course she had no idea what to do because she was a single mom. Her implication in that one single sentence, in her excuse for her ignorance, is that a woman couldn't possibly solve a mechanical problem without a man.

WTF? My mom was single, but she never used it as an excuse for not knowing how to do something "traditionally male." She never said, "Well, I'm a woman; this isn't my area." It's okay if you don't know how to do something, but don't blame it on your gender. Don't indirectly blame the opposite gender either, getting in a subliminal dig at the man who made you a "single mom." Guess what? Male or female, you are responsible for your own life, your own actions. Here's a novel idea: if you purchase and/or use a piece of equipment, learn how it works! At least familiarize yourself with the dangers, and how to troubleshoot if things go wrong.

It's just another case of maintaining status quo, the way things have always been. Our language, what we say, how we use it, helps to foster harmful ideas in both our own minds and in the minds of others. The more you repeat phrases like "acts of God," "I'm a girls, I don't do math," "I'm only one person," the more true they become, the more powerless we become.

We have to induce change at the most basic level: our thoughts, our words, our actions. If I think recycling is a pain, I consistently groan about how much of a pain it is, and I never get around to it, my lifestyle will continue its negative impact. If I think I can't change the oil in my car because I have two X chromosomes, then I'll never bother to learn. I will remain ignorant, powerless, and in many cases destructive to myself and my world.

Change begins here, people. If you think it, it will come.

Comments

ZenWoman said…
Right On Sister Roseslug! I couldn't agree more. It's already becoming more obvious that as each of us take small actions, it does make a HUGE difference (both for positive and negative change.)

Hope to see you before you leave for faraway places. glad I met you via NaNoWriMo!!! Write On!

Popular posts from this blog

Did Somebody Offer a Challenge?

Bruce Sterling over at Wired.com posted eighteen of them for Contemporary Literature. It's a skeletal overview: a list of statements without background or exploration of any. I'd like to offer a few brief thoughts on the list, just for my own brainstorming sake. Who knows; there may be eighteen papers in here somewhere. 1. Literature is language-based and national; contemporary society is globalizing and polyglot. "Contemporary society" is a pretty big blanket, there, Bruce. I think you might mean "contemporary digitally literate culture" - after all, it's only in the Westernized world that we are beginning to share our language and culture through global media such as Facebook and mobile phones. This also assumes a very strict definition of literature: that which is published in print form, presumably a book. 2. Vernacular means of everyday communication — cellphones, social networks, streaming video — are moving into areas where printed tex...

My Take on Specifications Grading (or, How I Learned to Not Spend My Weekends Marking)

I’ve been proselytizing this method for a while now, and have used it in a range of creative writing and publishing modules. It’s been wildly successful for me (though of course I’ll continue tweaking it), and enough people have asked about it that I thought I’d put it together into an overview/summary resource. It should probably be an actual paper one of these days, but that would require time and research and motivation. Natch. My teaching model is based on Linda Nilson’s Specifications Grading  (she’s also got a great intro article on Inside Higher Ed ), just so the original genius can get plenty of credit. My motivations are these: I came a hair’s breadth from burning out entirely. I went from teaching creative writing classes with 7-10 students on them to massive creative writing modules with 80+ students on them. Marking loads were insane, despite the fact that I have a pretty streamlined process with rubrics and QuickMarks and commonly used comments that I can cut and ...

In which the Apathy Monster is curtailed

Me, lately I spent my PhD years going to many, many  conferences. When you're in a small department in an isolated part of the world, they're kind of a necessity. You go to meet anyone - anyone  - who is doing similar stuff, and who won't stare at you blankly when you describe your research. You go to try out your ideas, to make sure the academic community you'll be pitching them to don't think you're an absolute waste of space ( imposter syndrome is for real). Also, you go just to go somewhere (though I think I went to Leicester far too often). In the last few years, as I've gained contacts and confidence, I've gone to fewer and fewer conferences. I know the ones that best suit me now, and where I'll get to meet and/or catch up with my peeps. I also know the ones, of course, where I've never made any headway at all. I was pleasantly surprised this week to be wrong about that last one. MIX Digital - Bath Spa University Let me back thi...